{"id":3808,"date":"2024-10-13T11:32:40","date_gmt":"2024-10-13T15:32:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wordpress-195849-4032129.cloudwaysapps.com\/blog\/how-to-get-through-a-michigan-indecent-exposure-charge\/"},"modified":"2025-01-22T16:50:37","modified_gmt":"2025-01-22T21:50:37","slug":"indecent-and-aggravated-indecent-exposure-charges-what-happens","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.randalawyers.com\/blog\/indecent-and-aggravated-indecent-exposure-charges-what-happens\/","title":{"rendered":"Indecent and Aggravated Indecent Exposure Charges – What Happens"},"content":{"rendered":"

$\"\"$ Let\u2019s quickly separate and explain the 2 indecent exposure (IE) charges: For starters, there\u2019s the plain old \u201cindecent exposure,\u201d meaning a person\u2019s genitals were exposed. This is a misdemeanor charge, and it can be brought for any kind exposure of the genitals, whether outright \u201cflashing,\u201d or even if a guy gets caught urinating. Next, there is \u201caggravated indecent exposure,\u201d where a person was observed fondling his or her genitals. \u201cFondling\u201d does not necessarily mean (although it can include) actual masturbation. Thus, any rubbing of the genitals is enough. Aggravated indecent exposure is a felony, but a special kind of \u201clight\u201d (meaning lenient) felony, often called a \u201chigh court misdemeanor.\u201d To be perfectly clear about it, although the term “high court misdemeanor” may sound better, it is still a felony.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s not uncommon for someone facing an IE charge to panic when they hear the word \u201cfelony,\u201d but the good news is that here, that reaction is mostly unfounded. Sure, an aggravated indecent exposure charge is in some ways, \u201cworse\u201d than plain old indecent exposure, but that has more to do with procedure and, yes, money. A felony can involve way more court appearances and legal work than a misdemeanor. Even so, at the end of the day, most aggravated indecent exposure cases can be wrapped up rather simply, and without a lot of negative consequences (like jail). There are, however, certain important potential issues that must be addressed in both indecent or aggravated indecent exposure cases to make things go more smoothly. Let\u2019s look at them\u2026<\/p>\n

First, we have to determine if the exposure<\/a> was deliberate, or more accidental. A guy caught peeing behind a building, at night, obviously has very different intentions than one who rises up in the driver\u2019s seat of his vehicle and shakes his penis at someone. However, I\u2019ve had aggravated indecent exposure<\/a> charges made against guys who have pulled to the back of what they thought was a deserted parking lot in order to have a little \u201calone time,\u201d only to have the police roll up on them. I\u2019ve also had guys arrested as part of an online \u201csting\u201d where they had placed ads offering to \u201cjerk\u201d for a female audience, only to find out the interested woman was, in fact, an undercover detective. In truth, though, it’s mostly an urban legend that someone gets charged for relieving themselves behind the dumpster.<\/p>\n

Second, the person\u2019s intentions do matter. If a man is sitting in his car in a less occupied area, and when a solitary woman walks by, he makes sure she see him fondling himself, that just \u201cseems\u201d a lot scarier than some guy driving by at 45 miles per hour who quickly flashes his junk before disappearing into traffic. I\u2019ve had any number of cases that have arisen because a guy has exposed himself after misreading the intentions or receptiveness of another person. This is much different than the case of the guy just waiting for a woman to walk by in a desolate place, with what seems to be a real desire to frighten and\/or intimidate. That kind of behavior opens up a can of potential psychological issues much more serious than a drunken person in a passenger seat of a car who hangs his butt out of the window, mooning everyone within sight while yelling \u201cwoo-hoo!\u201d<\/p>\n

The takeaway here is that it\u2019s worse if your intention in making the exposure was to intimidate and cause fear in someone. It is important to distinguish that kind of behavior from the kind of situations that we see all the time, where a man wants women to see his genitals, but really hasn\u2019t thought through why he\u2019s doing it, and certainly has no intention of causing her mortal fear. The risk, of course, is that intentions, or lack of them, can be misread, especially when you\u2019re talking about exposing one\u2019s genitals to an unsuspecting audience.<\/p>\n

Most guys who flash are just \u201cacting out\u201d for some reason or another. In the real world, people have different ways of blowing off steam, and while some guys may get drunk or punch a wall, some guys expose themselves for a kind of \u201cshock value.\u201d I cannot count the number of decent guys with good jobs who just get stressed out and do something stupid, like exposing themselves. As much as that may help explain what happened, however, it certainly doesn\u2019t excuse it, especially in terms of criminal responsibility.<\/p>\n

The most important reason intentions matter so much has to do with what\u2019s called \u201cprogression,\u201d where a sexual predator will start out doing less serious things (like exposing himself) and then progress to more dangerous and severe sexually delinquent conduct. The kinds of people who hire me are decidedly NOT predators, but that doesn\u2019t change the equation here. As experience teaches, most sexually delinquent people start small, just like every habitual drunk driver begins with a 1st offense.<\/p>\n

Third, then, is making sure a person doesn\u2019t present as any kind of predator, and equally important, doesn\u2019t have the potential to become one. This is more obvious in some cases, like where a guy thought he found a secluded parking spot for a little self-pleasure, whereas, in others, it\u2019s more of an open question, like when a repeat drive-through customer at a donut shop always has his pants undone by the time he gets to the pickup window. And yes, that last example comes from a real case I had.<\/p>\n

This whole issue of progression is really important. In fact, it is so critical that, unless the facts of the case absolutely and clearly rule it out, then it is up the defense lawyer<\/a> to make sure the is no question about a person\u2019s lack of predatory intent or inclinations by having the client undergo and then providing to the relevant parties (usually the prosecutor and probation officer, and always the Judge) a thorough psychological assessment. This is deep stuff, and these specialized assessments are best left to the relatively few practitioners who concentrate in this field, rather than the local, albeit well-meaning counselor or therapist nearby.<\/p>\n

Even when the evidence in an IE case<\/a> is beyond dispute, being able to show that the person is not a predator, or a predator in the making, has value beyond words in the plea and\/or sentence negotiation process. In many IE cases<\/a>, including those where my client\u2019s guilt is essentially crystal clear, I am able to work things out so that nothing goes on his (or her) record. That will never happen, though, if there is any question that the person may be some kind of potential sexual deviant or predator.<\/p>\n

When all of the legal work<\/a> is done properly, the client can avoid being made to feel like a \u201cpervert,\u201d and can often keep a clean record, as well, or at least avoid any kind of sex-related conviction going on it.<\/p>\n

Sex offender registration is NOT required in indecent exposure cases unless there is a \u201cvictim\u201d (in IE cases, this basically means a witness) who is a minor, and that seldom happens. This means, then, that if you\u2019re facing an indecent exposure or aggravated indecent exposure charge and freaking out about having to register as a sex offender<\/a>, don\u2019t. No lawyer is going to \u201csave\u201d you from having to do so precisely because, unless you exposed yourself to a minor, it\u2019s not part of the law and therefore not going to happen, anyway.<\/p>\n

When a person gets caught up in an isolated incident of exposure and we can show that he (or she, although these issues about being a predator almost always involve men, and not women) isn\u2019t a danger to the public, isn\u2019t some kind of traveling exhibitionist, and otherwise isn\u2019t a risk to \u201cprogress,\u201d then we can avoid almost all the things that seem so scary at the outset, including (and most importantly) jail and sex offender registration.<\/p>\n

If you\u2019re facing an IE charge<\/a>, do your homework. Read around, but run away from any site or post that tries to scare you by quickly reminding you of the horrible, potential legal consequences you face. Those exist in theory, like the one-in-a-million adverse drug reactions you hear at the end of an ad for some medication. In the real world, however, you get into your car and drive, expecting to make it to your destination. Of course, in theory, you could crash and die. Ditto with taking a plane ride somewhere. Ditto again for IE cases. In practice, if a case is handled correctly, the real consequences you face involve counseling and probation, not getting locked up and having your picture all over the internet.<\/p>\n

When you\u2019re ready to make serious inquiries for a lawyer, check around. If your case is pending in Oakland, Macomb or Wayne County, give me a ring. All of my consultations are confidential and done over the phone, right when you call. We\u2019re really friendly people, and will be glad to answer your question and explain things to help you make the decision that\u2019s best for you. You can reach my office Monday through Friday, from 8:30 a.m. until 5:00 p.m., at 586-465-1980. We\u2019re here to help.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"